Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Lines and circles

I wonder if we appreciate the difficulty of Joshua's task of leadership the day that Moses didn't come down from the mountain (Josh 1). The transition of leadership from one person to another is always fraught with difficulty. That change of person and power is vastly complicated when the new leader follows a leader that is good at the job, and nearly impossible when the previous leader has been the object of reverence and respect.

The initial reflex of leaders in such cases is to circle the wagons until the lines of authority become clear. Surely someone in Joshua's inner circle counseled him, "Allow people to get used to your voice and your style." But his choice made his leadership task that much more difficult; he followed God's instructions and made a bee line for the promised land. Perhaps this passionately brave act in the face of coolly cautious logic is why God encouraged Joshua to "be strong and courageous."

Oh, it's not like Joshua didn't check to see if anyone was following. He immediately queried the 2 1/2 tribes that were getting land on the east side of the river, and they reassured him: "Don't worry, Joshua, we'll toe the line. Be strong and courageous!" What made such remarkable loyalty possible? What assured the people that they could faithfully follow Joshua?

Their leader may have changed, but their God had not. As they lined up to march to the Jordan (Josh 3), the ark of the covenant, the very symbol of God's presence, moved one half of a mile in front of the nearest tribe. A full seven minutes ahead of the first soldier (I rather suspect that God is actually much farther ahead of his people than that). And then, in the middle of the river and on the other side, they left memorials of 12 stones. Some scholars believe that the Israelites did not stack these stones, but placed them in a circle (Gilgal can mean circular). Each tribe equal; each tribe a part, all of the tribes united. Whenever God leads, whether through transition, trouble, or temptation, the godly leader is assured of success (at least in God's terms). In this case, God led his people through a river swollen to its annual flood stage. Through battles with a stronger and more numerous foe. Even through their own failings and sin.

Both a godly leader and his people can be strong and courageous when they know that their true loyalties are to a God who is loyalty personified. If my leader is loyal to God, I can loyally follow. If my people are united, and loyal to God, I can lead as God would have me and be assured that they will follow. What makes a transition of leadership like the one from Moses to Joshua survivable? Loyalty and unity.

Grace and peace,

Ron